Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 costs 59.99. Do you want to pay 59.99 for this game? Or would you rather pay 6.99 instead and just accept the fact that it's not Modern Wafare? Personally, I'd rather pay 6.99 and accept the fact that I'm not going to everything I could ever possibly want in a game at that costs 1/6 the price of a new release console game.
Uuhhhh hello? It's called giving advice. So you're saying that we might as well put up with a crappier game because it costs less? LOL! Even with a smaller pricetag, the editors and designers can still try as hard as they can and take active suggestions. If you don't want to help make the game better then just get out. Also, prince of Persia: Sands of Time costs $25 and ported on the iPod it's only $8. Your point just got bombed.
yeah, but it's a port...of a 6 year old game... On another note, I'm getting sick of BOTH the people who want the game to be just like CoD AND the people who come down on them when they do. Sure it's not gonna be a portable modern warfare, we all know that but it doesn't mean people can't post wishlists of what they would like to see and what gameloft could do to make it a more call of duty-like experience. Why don't we spend our time speculating on what the game will ACTUALLY be like instead of going back and forth over a point that's been argued a million times.
The age of the game is irrelevant to my point, but I completely agree with the second part. Also $6.99 isn't 1/6 of $59.99, it's more like 1/9, or 2/17. Just sayin'.
you like or not COD IS a good game and one of the 3-4 bests FPS so it's logically from people to wait a COD like game since the first modern combat I can say it is more like cod then any other game....well ofcorse it can't be transferred the whole thing (yet...) but MC can take some stuff from MW. Oh yea is there any release date???
I thought MC Sandstorm was better than the actual $30 DS COD Modern Warfare game for the DS so I was quite impredssed with the price.
The cod games on the DS absolutely suck mostly because of the controls and the graphics, I don't understand why activision gave up on the PSP with cod, medal of honour did well on the PSP. So I also thought MC was better, despite having alot of shortcomings
yeah but the DS games aren't designed for that. they are supposed to be really fun 2D games, like Pokemon and Mario.
No offense to my fellow activisioners, but you are all stupid for the fact that you made a full Call Of Duty game for the DS and not the iphone, when you know the iphone has the best graphics and a better control system. Everytime i play cod4 on ds, its so pixelated. Like the resolution is so low. The game is trash on it. Anyway now activision is history for me on the iphone. Gameloft are the new Activision! Now bring out Black..P..e..a..g..u..s!!!
I agree with the graphics and resolution, but controls always work best with a physical controller...
Naah I think controls are better on iPhone.FPS's on psp at least have HORRIBLE controls I don't know but I like touch controls ofcorse two physical d-pads are better
The DS cod controls are horrible, I don't mind FPS controls on psp but the iPhone has the best FPS controls of portable consoles
They weren't that bad... In fact, I find them much more usable than the PSP Call of Duty's controls. I was able to beat Call of Duty 4 and get through most of World at War on the DS without a problem with the controls (well, aside from the double tap to aim in COD4 which was fixed in WaW). Other games like Metroid and Dementium did a good job making FPS games easy to play on the DS.
I think i can headshot people with a sniper quicker on Modern Combat:Sandstorm multi-player on iphone with full touch controls, then i would be able to on Ds using those buttons and clumsy touchscreen controls. And i find that touchscreen best suits me for almost everything.. Hmm i might be mr. Jobs brother. :0
